Supplementary file 1_Comparative effectiveness of debridement strategies for chronic lower

25 randomized controlled trials comparing debridement strategies for chronic lower-extremity wounds, published between 1990 and February 2026. The dataset is a systematic review and network meta-analysis authored by Guorui Li, summarizing evidence on wound healing, complete debridement, pain, procedure time, and time to healing. It was last updated on 2026-05-21 and is available under a CC-BY-4.0 license.

Use Cases

• Ranking debridement strategies for wound healing based on SUCRA probabilities reported in the review
• Comparing procedure times for different debridement methods mentioned in the results
• Analyzing the relationship between debridement type and pain scores as described in the outcomes
• Assessing the certainty of evidence for wound care interventions based on reported heterogeneity and network sparsity

Strengths

• Follows PRISMA-NMA guidelines for systematic review and network meta-analysis methodology
• Includes 25 randomized controlled trials sourced from multiple databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library
• Reports specific Surface under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) values, such as 99.5% for biological debridement on wound healing

Limitations

• Description metadata is limited; actual data quality requires manual inspection after download
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download
• The review notes limitations including wide credible intervals, clinical heterogeneity, sparse networks, and methodological limitations in the included studies

Provenance

Source

figshare, authored by Guorui Li

Collection Method

Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Time Range

January 1990 to February 2026

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-21 04:19:27; freshness should be verified