Meta-Analysis of Medical vs. Surgical Management for Missed Miscarriage, 1994-2025

Seven studies published between 1994 and 2025, including four randomized controlled trials and three cohort studies, were analyzed. The meta-analysis compares the efficacy and safety of medical versus surgical management for missed miscarriage across 1,637 patients. It was authored by Kaiyi Wei and published on figshare in 2026.

Use Cases

• Comparing clinical success rates between medical and surgical management based on the reported risk differences.
• Analyzing bleeding duration outcomes between treatment groups based on the weighted mean difference.
• Investigating complication and infection rates to assess treatment safety profiles.
• Examining gestational age as a source of heterogeneity in treatment outcomes via subgroup analysis.

Strengths

• Analysis is based on seven studies with a total of 1,637 patient records.
• Follows PRISMA 2020 and MOOSE guidelines for systematic review and meta-analysis.
• Includes sensitivity and subgroup analyses to examine heterogeneity and influential publications.

Limitations

• The dataset is a 16.2 KB DOCX file, indicating a very small-scale textual summary rather than raw clinical data.
• Column-level documentation for the underlying study data is absent; field semantics must be inferred.
• Row count for the original patient-level data is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.

Provenance

Source

Kaiyi Wei via figshare.

Collection Method

Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and ScienceDirect.

Time Range

Studies conducted between 1994 and 2025.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-04-15 05:32:47.

Geography

null