LISTS: Longitudinal Implementation Strategy Tracking System Usability Study

James L. Merle published a think-aloud study evaluating the Longitudinal Implementation Strategy Tracking System (LISTS) on 2026-05-12. The study assessed the usability and feasibility of this web-based platform for tracking implementation strategies in health services research. Nine implementation researchers completed structured think-aloud sessions, System Usability Scale (SUS), and NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) assessments.

Use Cases

• Evaluate digital tool usability based on structured think-aloud protocols described in the study.
• Assess methodological fit of implementation tracking systems based on theoretical alignment with established frameworks.
• Analyze barriers to digital tool adoption in research based on identified terminology density and workflow ambiguity.

Strengths

• Mean System Usability Scale (SUS) score of 76.94 indicates good perceived usability.
• Mean NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) workload was low at 1.98 on a 1–7 scale.
• Study involved nine implementation researchers, providing a qualitative and quantitative assessment.

Limitations

• Dataset is a 709.0 KB DOCX file containing a study manuscript, not a primary data collection.
• Column-level documentation for any underlying data is absent; field semantics must be inferred from the paper.
• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment for direct data analysis.

Provenance

Source

figshare

Collection Method

Structured think-aloud usability sessions with nine implementation researchers.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-12 05:26:40.