Botany Field Practice Evaluation: Qualimetric Scores for 387 Students

387 undergraduate students participated in a structured survey and rubric-based evaluation of botany field-practice learning materials and outcomes. The dataset contains normalized and aggregated integral quality indices for seven dimensions, showing high overall quality for materials (KQ=0.726) and outcomes (KQ=0.706). The study was authored by Gulmira Yeshimbetova and last updated on 2026-05-28.

Use Cases

• Benchmarking instructional material quality based on the seven-dimensional qualimetric framework
• Analyzing alignment between instructional inputs and student learning outputs using integral quality indices
• Identifying relative weaknesses in student performance, such as inquiry-based fieldwork skills
• Developing pedagogical support strategies for higher-order competencies in field-based learning

Strengths

• Dataset includes scores from 387 undergraduate students, providing a substantial sample size.
• Evaluation is based on a structured survey and rubric covering seven quality dimensions.
• Results include specific integral quality indices for instructional materials (KQ=0.726) and student outcomes (KQ=0.706).

Limitations

• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• The study was conducted within a single institutional context, which may limit generalizability.

Provenance

Source

figshare

Collection Method

Data collected from undergraduate students using a structured survey and an evaluation rubric.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-28 06:18:30; freshness should be verified.