Meta-Analysis Results on Missed Miscarriage Management Efficacy and Safety

Seven studies published between 1994 and 2025, involving 1,637 patients, were analyzed. The meta-analysis compares surgical and medical management for missed miscarriage, reporting pooled risk differences and weighted mean differences for success rate, bleeding duration, and complication rate. Author Kaiyi Wei published the findings under a CC-BY-4.0 license on figshare in April 2026.

Use Cases

• Compare clinical efficacy of surgical versus medical management based on the reported success rate risk difference.
• Analyze safety outcomes based on the reported complication rate risk difference.
• Model treatment duration based on the reported weighted mean difference for bleeding duration.
• Investigate sources of heterogeneity in treatment outcomes based on the subgroup analysis for gestational week.

Strengths

• Analysis is based on seven studies, including four randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
• Includes data from 1,637 patients, providing a substantive sample size for the meta-analysis.
• Follows PRISMA 2020 and MOOSE guidelines for systematic review and meta-analysis methodology.

Limitations

• The dataset is a 17.7 KB DOCX file, indicating it contains summary text or tables rather than raw patient-level data.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment for certain analytical tasks.

Provenance

Source

Kaiyi Wei

Collection Method

Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and ScienceDirect databases.

Time Range

Studies conducted between 1994 and 2025.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-04-15 05:32:47; freshness should be verified.

Geography

null