Supplementary file 2_The impact of circular economy and community development on human wel

34 peer-reviewed studies from 2012–2025 were synthesized following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The review, authored by Kurniawan Saefullah and published on figshare, analyzes the impact of grassroots circular practices on multidimensional wellbeing. It includes a quality assessment where 12 studies were rated high, 18 moderate, and 4 low.

Use Cases

• Analyzing the 'wellbeing paradox' of economic benefits versus health risks in informal circular work based on the review's key finding.
• Mapping five-dimensional wellbeing outcomes (economic, social, environmental, health, empowerment) of community-level practices as described in the research objective.
• Comparing necessity-driven, grassroots circular practices in the Global South with dominant technocentric frameworks as discussed in the field intervention.

Strengths

• Follows a systematic methodology (PRISMA 2020) and includes a quality assessment using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).
• Synthesizes evidence from 34 studies, providing a focused analysis on a defined research gap.
• Published under a permissive CC-BY-4.0 license, allowing for reuse and redistribution.

Limitations

• The dataset is a 197.5 KB PDF document; the underlying review data (e.g., coded studies) is not provided in a structured, machine-readable format.
• Row count and column-level documentation are absent, limiting direct computational analysis.
• The temporal coverage (2012–2025) and geographic focus (Indonesia) may limit generalizability to other regions or time periods.

Provenance

Source

figshare

Collection Method

Systematic literature review conducted using Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed.

Time Range

2012–2025

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-19 04:20:59.

Geography

Indonesia