Botany Field Practice Evaluation Survey Data from 387 Students

387 undergraduate students participated in a structured survey and rubric evaluation for a botany field-practice study. The data includes normalized scores across seven quality dimensions aggregated into integral quality indices for instructional materials and student outcomes. The dataset was authored by Gulmira Yeshimbetova and last updated on 2026-05-28.

Use Cases

• Evaluate the alignment between instructional materials and student learning outcomes based on the qualimetric framework.
• Analyze variability in student performance across different competency dimensions, such as inquiry-based fieldwork skills.
• Benchmark the quality of field-practice implementation using the reported integral quality indices (KQ).

Strengths

• Data was collected from 387 undergraduate students, providing a substantial sample size.
• The study applied a structured multi-criteria evaluation rubric covering seven quality dimensions.
• Results include specific integral quality indices for instructional materials (KQ=0.726) and student outcomes (KQ=0.706).

Limitations

• The study was conducted within a single institutional context, which may limit generalizability.
• Row count and column-level documentation are unknown, requiring manual inspection after download.
• The dataset is small (173.4 KB), indicating limited scope.

Provenance

Source

figshare

Collection Method

Data collected via a structured survey and evaluation rubric from undergraduate students.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-28 06:18:30; freshness should be verified.