Ciprofol vs Propofol Anesthesia Induction Efficacy and Safety in Orthopedic Surgery

Supplementary Material for a clinical trial comparing the novel anesthetic ciprofol to propofol for induction in major orthopedic surgery. The study involved 245 patients (ASA I–II) and measured outcomes including induction success, hemodynamic stability, and injection-site pain. The dataset was uploaded by figshare admin karger on 2026-05-16 and is licensed under CC-BY-4.0.

Use Cases

• Compare induction success rates based on OAA/S scores between two anesthetic agents.
• Analyze hemodynamic stability based on reported incidence of hypotension.
• Evaluate patient-reported injection-site pain based on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores.
• Assess sedation depth and time to induction based on Bispectral Index (BIS) changes and induction times.

Strengths

• Contains results from a clinical trial with 245 patients, providing a substantial sample size.
• Reports specific, comparative metrics such as a 9% vs. 28% incidence of hypotension and median VAS scores of 4 vs. 5.
• Includes detailed methodology describing drug dosages and induction protocols.

Limitations

• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• The dataset is a 132.5 KB DOCX file, suggesting it contains supplementary text rather than structured data tables.

Provenance

Source

figshare admin karger

Collection Method

Data originates from a clinical trial comparing ciprofol and propofol for anesthesia induction.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-16 07:55:14; freshness should be verified.