Hospital-at-Home Efficacy and Safety Meta-Analysis for Older Patients

Eleven randomized controlled trials involving 3,301 patients form the basis of this systematic review and meta-analysis. The analysis, published by figshare admin karger in 2026, compares the Hospital-at-Home model to traditional hospital care for older patients. It reports significant differences in length of stay, healthcare costs, and readmission rates.

Use Cases

• Benchmarking length of stay reductions for home-based care models based on the reported standardized mean difference.
• Analyzing cost-effectiveness of healthcare interventions based on the total cost outcome data.
• Modeling readmission risk over different time horizons based on the one, three, and nine-month subgroup analyses.
• Evaluating functional recovery metrics based on the instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scores.

Strengths

• Based on a systematic review of 11 randomized controlled trials, a gold-standard study design.
• Includes data from 3,301 individual patients, providing a substantive sample size.
• Reports multiple standardized outcome measures (SMD, RR) with confidence intervals and p-values.

Limitations

• The primary data file is a 58.1 KB DOCX document, suggesting limited raw data scope.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment for large-scale modeling.

Provenance

Source

figshare admin karger

Collection Method

Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs from PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, SinoMed, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

Time Range

Trials published up to April 15,我们发现2024.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-04-15 09:55:33; freshness should be verified.

Geography

null