Supplementary Material for: Intermittent hemodialysis with regional citrate anticoagulatio

60 high-bleeding-risk patients were randomized between 2019 and 2020 to compare two intermittent hemodialysis techniques. The supplementary material includes results on session success rates, adequacy (KT/V), dialyzer status, costs, and nursing workload. This document dataset was authored by figshare admin karger and is licensed under CC-BY-4.0.

Use Cases

• Compare session success rates between pre-diluted IHDF and regional citrate anticoagulation based on the primary outcome data.
• Analyze cost and organizational differences from the nurse's viewpoint based on the workload and hospital cost data.
• Evaluate dialysis adequacy and blood flow parameters based on the reported KT/V and blood flow measurements.
• Assess the risk of coagulation during sessions based on the visual coagulation score results.

Strengths

• Data originates from a single-center randomized controlled trial (NCT 03562754) with a defined protocol.
• Includes specific numerical results for primary and secondary outcomes, such as success rates (96% vs. 83%) and KT/V values (1.69 vs. 1.61).
• Compares two distinct hemodialysis techniques over a defined period (2019-2020).

Limitations

• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• Data is from a single center, which may limit generalizability.

Provenance

Source

figshare admin karger

Collection Method

Single-center randomized controlled trial.

Time Range

2019-2020

Freshness

Last updated 2026-06-04 07:55:13; freshness should be verified.