Supplementary Material for: Structured Feedback Tools in Surgical Training: Results of the

German urology residents participated in a 2024 endoscopic simulation workshop. The dataset contains survey results and assessment scores from 15 participants evaluating two structured feedback tools, the Global Rating Scale (GRS) and Global Assessment of Urological Endoscopic Skills (GAUES). It was published on figshare under a CC-BY-4.0 license.

Use Cases

• Compare the correlation between Global Rating Scale (GRS) and Global Assessment of Urological Endoscopic Skills (GAUES) scores for different endoscopic procedures.
• Analyze resident perceptions of structured feedback utility based on the post-workshop survey results.
• Evaluate the reported need for structured feedback in urological residency training programs.
• Assess the performance of task-specific assessment tools like GAUES versus more general tools like GRS.

Strengths

• Includes specific performance scores for three endoscopic procedures (URS, TURB, TURP) from 15 participants.
• Reports strong positive correlations (e.g., ρ=0.85 for URS) between the two assessment tools.
• Contains demographic breakdowns of participants, including gender (53% female) and training stage (60% early-stage residents).

Limitations

• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• The dataset is very small (115.5 KB), reflecting a limited scope from a single workshop.

Provenance

Source

figshare

Collection Method

Data collected via simulation training assessments and an online survey during the 2024 Endo-Workshop of the German Society of Residents in Urology (GeSRU).

Time Range

2024

Freshness

Last updated 2026-04-30 05:55:17; freshness should be verified.

Geography

Germany