VR vs AR Bronchoscopy Simulator Performance and Cognitive Load Trial Data

A single-center randomized controlled trial compared virtual reality and augmented reality bronchoscopy simulator training for 30 novice bronchoscopists. The dataset contains results on diagnostic completeness, structured progress, procedure time, and NASA-TLX cognitive load scores from tests on two different airway models. It supports analysis of how simulator type affects navigation performance and training demands.

Use Cases

• Comparing training outcomes between VR and AR bronchoscopy simulators based on diagnostic completeness and procedure time metrics
• Analyzing the relationship between simulator type and cognitive load using NASA-TLX scores
• Evaluating the transfer of training skills between different airway models (BronchoBoy and Koken)
• Studying the impact of mastery learning protocols on novice bronchoscopist performance

Strengths

• Data originates from a randomized controlled trial with 30 participants, providing a structured experimental design
• Includes performance metrics from two different test models (BronchoBoy and Koken) for comparative analysis
• Contains cognitive load assessment using the standardized NASA-TLX instrument

Limitations

• Column names and specific data structure are not provided in the source metadata
• The dataset size is given as 532515 bytes, but the row count is unknown, limiting assessment of scale
• Relies on a single-center study, which may affect generalizability

Provenance

Source

figshare admin karger

Collection Method

Data collected from a single-center, single-blinded, randomized control trial.

Time Range

null

Freshness

Last updated on 2026-03-19.

Geography

null