Chinese Academics' Peer Review Experiences and Motivations

Pengjuan Wang's doctoral research dataset investigates scholars' participation in peer review across Chinese-language and English-language academic journals. It contains interview transcripts from 63 academic researchers, along with supporting materials like an interview protocol and coded excerpts. The data explores motivations, experiences, and attitudes toward reviewing for domestic and international journals.

Use Cases

• Analyzing motivations for peer review participation based on interview transcripts.
• Comparing attitudes toward domestic versus international journals using coded thematic analysis.
• Studying researcher experiences in the peer review process through qualitative interview data.
• Developing interview protocols for similar studies on academic labor and scholarly evaluation.

Strengths

• Includes primary qualitative data from 63 academic researcher participants.
• Contains analytical materials like coded excerpts and thematic analysis documents derived from the interviews.
• Provides supporting methodological documents, including the interview invitation and protocol.

Limitations

• Specific column names and file formats are not listed, limiting understanding of the data's internal structure.
• The dataset's size and row count are unknown, making it difficult to assess its scale.
• The description is repeated across sources, offering no additional technical or contextual detail.

Provenance

Source

Pengjuan Wang's doctoral research project.

Collection Method

Data was gathered via semi-structured interviews with academic researchers.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-03-18.

Geography

Likely focuses on Chinese academics, but specific geographic coverage is not stated.