Table 1_A comparative study of clinical efficacy, electrophysiological outcomes, and perio

Zhiqi Zhang's dataset compares endoscopic and open carpal tunnel release for 112 patients treated between January 2022 and December 2024. It includes primary outcomes like symptom severity and pain scores, secondary electrophysiological indices, and perioperative parameters. The data was last updated on June 3, 2026, and is licensed under CC-BY-4.0.

Use Cases

• Compare clinical efficacy between surgical techniques based on Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire scores.
• Analyze cost-effectiveness and operative time differences between endoscopic and open release.
• Evaluate electrophysiological recovery post-surgery based on median nerve conduction parameters.
• Study long-term patient outcomes and complication rates over a follow-up period of 13 to 48 months.

Strengths

• Includes data for 112 patients with a median follow-up of 34 months.
• Measures multiple clinical and electrophysiological outcomes, including VAS, BCTQ scores, SNCV, SNAP, DML, and CMAP.
• Provides specific time ranges for patient treatment (2022-2024) and follow-up (cutoff February 2026).

Limitations

• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• Data reflects a single institution's patient population, which may limit generalizability.

Provenance

Source

Zhiqi Zhang via figshare

Collection Method

Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients at a single institution.

Time Range

Patient treatment from January 2022 to December 2024, with follow-up until February 2026.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-06-03 04:47:11; freshness should be verified.