Art and Design Student Creativity Scores from a 16-Week Flipped Classroom Trial

A randomized controlled trial with 48 art and design students assessed for creativity before and after a 16-week self-regulated flipped classroom intervention. The dataset, authored by Yongkang Chen and last updated in May 2026, contains results from the Guilford Alternate Uses Test and Remote Associates Test. It compares divergent and convergent thinking outcomes between intervention and control groups.

Use Cases

• Compare divergent thinking scores (fluency, originality) between flipped and traditional classrooms based on the described intervention.
• Analyze the effect of a self-regulated learning structure on specific creativity metrics mentioned in the results.
• Benchmark pre- and post-intervention creativity assessment results for art and design student populations.
• Investigate the relationship between instructional design (flipped classroom) and generative aspects of creative performance.

Strengths

• Data originates from a randomized controlled trial, a strong experimental design.
• Includes pre- and post-intervention assessments for both control (n=24) and intervention (n=24) groups.
• Uses established creativity assessment tools (Guilford Alternate Uses Test, Remote Associates Test).
• Released under a permissive CC-BY-4.0 license for reuse.

Limitations

• Dataset is very small at 13.3 KB, indicating limited scope and sample size.
• Row count and column-level documentation are unknown, requiring manual inspection after download.
• The geographic and institutional context of the student participants is unspecified.

Provenance

Source

Yongkang Chen via figshare

Collection Method

Collected via a 16-week randomized controlled trial with art and design students.

Time Range

Covers a 16-week intervention period; specific years not provided.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-29 06:07:42