Table 1_Comparative efficacy of different mind–body exercises on functional capacity and q

Twenty-eight randomized controlled trials were analyzed to compare mind-body exercise interventions for chronic heart failure patients. The dataset contains results from a network meta-analysis, including SUCRA rankings and cluster analysis, published by Yongliang Zhu in May 2026. The evidence certainty was rated as Moderate according to the CINeMA framework.

Use Cases

• Ranking the efficacy of different mind-body exercises for improving quality of life based on MLHFQ scores.
• Comparing the impact of interventions like Yijinjing and Meditation on cardiopulmonary endurance based on Peak VO2 data.
• Identifying synergistic trends between exercise types for enhancing both quality of life and exercise tolerance via cluster analysis.
• Assessing the potential of movement-integrated meditation for improving functional exercise tolerance based on 6MWD outcomes.

Strengths

• Analysis is based on 28 randomized controlled trials, providing a structured evidence base.
• The certainty of evidence was formally evaluated using the CINeMA framework and rated as Moderate.
• Methods included network meta-analysis, SUCRA ranking, and cluster analysis to compare multiple interventions.

Limitations

• The dataset is a 22.7 KB DOCX file, suggesting it is a summary document rather than raw trial data.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred from the text.
• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment for quantitative analysis.

Provenance

Source

Systematic review of databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library.

Collection Method

Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials conducted by two independent researchers.

Time Range

Trials from database inception to January 12, 2026.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-01 04:17:28.