Table 1_Comparative efficacy of portable active cooling vs. passive cooling for reducing c

Chuankai Shi's systematic review and meta-analysis compares cooling rates for exertional heat stroke. The analysis includes 11 trials with 148 participants, finding a significant advantage for certain portable active cooling devices. The dataset, last updated in May 2026, is a 28.8 KB document summarizing the review's methods and findings.

Use Cases

• Benchmarking cooling device efficacy based on the reported mean cooling rate difference of 0.02 °C/min.
• Informing clinical guidelines for exertional heat stroke management based on the subgroup analysis of device types.
• Designing future trials on exercise-induced hyperthermia based on the systematic review's included study parameters.

Strengths

• The analysis is based on a systematic review following PRISMA 2020 guidelines with a PROSPERO registration (CRD420261292698).
• Results include specific quantitative findings, such as a mean difference of 0.02 °C/min with a 95% CI and p-value.
• Subgroup analysis provides granular insights, differentiating between two types of portable cooling devices.

Limitations

• The dataset is a 28.8 KB summary document; the underlying trial-level data is not provided.
• Row count and column-level documentation for any potential supplementary data are unknown.
• The description does not specify the temporal range of the included studies.

Provenance

Source

Chuankai Shi via figshare

Collection Method

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and crossover trials.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-29 06:13:25.