Meta-Analysis on Cross-Training Effects Between Running and Cycling

7 randomized controlled trials form the basis of this systematic review and meta-analysis comparing running-only and cycling-only training interventions. The study, authored by T. Menges and uploaded to figshare, analyzes the transfer effects on sport-specific VO2max and running performance. It was last updated on 2026-05-25.

Use Cases

• Evaluating the efficacy of cross-training for maintaining aerobic capacity based on VO2max outcomes.
• Comparing sport-specific performance adaptations between running and cycling based on time trial results.
• Assessing the methodological robustness of training studies based on the included sensitivity and heterogeneity analyses.

Strengths

• Includes 7 randomized controlled trials meeting specific inclusion criteria.
• Employs meta-analytic methods including standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) and heterogeneity assessment.
• Released under a CC-BY-4.0 license, permitting broad reuse.

Limitations

• The dataset is a 53.3 KB PDF document; the underlying tabular meta-analysis data is not provided separately.
• The description notes a limited number of studies and methodological heterogeneity among the included trials.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred from the PDF.

Provenance

Source

figshare

Collection Method

Systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-25 06:03:51.