CECT and DSA Findings in Severe Acute Pancreatitis Hemorrhage

69 bleeding episodes in 56 severe acute pancreatitis patients were analyzed to compare contrast-enhanced CT and angiographic findings. The dataset, authored by Yinshan Wu and last updated in June 2026, shows only fair agreement (weighted κ=0.29) between the two imaging modalities. It includes outcomes such as embolization success, rebleeding, and surgical rescue.

Use Cases

• Assessing diagnostic concordance between CECT and DSA based on the 3-point grading scale for hemorrhage.
• Predicting clinical outcomes like embolization success based on imaging findings.
• Evaluating the positive predictive value of definitive CT findings for active hemorrhage.
• Analyzing the rate of surgical rescue required after angiographic evaluation.

Strengths

• Includes 69 bleeding episodes from 56 patients, providing a specific clinical cohort.
• Reports a specific statistical measure of agreement (weighted κ=0.29).
• Contains outcome data such as embolization success rates (e.g., 18/26 successful in Grade 0 CECT).

Limitations

• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• Data may reflect selection bias inherent to a single-center, high-risk cohort study.

Provenance

Source

figshare, author Yinshan Wu.

Collection Method

Retrospective analysis of patient imaging and clinical records.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-06-01 05:18:21; freshness should be verified.