Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Remote Breastfeeding Guidance Effects

A 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis of 30 randomized controlled trials involving 8,389 infants. The study, authored by Miaomiao Hu, assesses the impact of remote breastfeeding support on feeding practices and neonatal health outcomes. It includes subgroup analyses for developed and less developed regions.

Use Cases

• Assess the efficacy of remote breastfeeding support programs based on the reported risk ratios for exclusive breastfeeding.
• Compare intervention effects across economic regions based on the subgroup analysis results.
• Evaluate the impact of digital health guidance on infant weight gain based on the reported mean difference.
• Inform the design of maternal health initiatives based on the robustness of findings confirmed by Trial Sequential Analysis.

Strengths

• Includes data from 30 randomized controlled trials, a substantial number for a meta-analysis.
• Reports specific statistical results, including risk ratios and confidence intervals for key outcomes.
• Conducts subgroup analyses to compare effects in developed versus less developed regions.
• Employs Trial Sequential Analysis to confirm the robustness of the findings.

Limitations

• Description metadata is limited; actual data quality requires manual inspection after download.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• The dataset is a 24.6 KB document, indicating it contains summary results rather than raw trial data.

Provenance

Source

figshare

Collection Method

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library.

Time Range

Literature screened from database inception to November 2024.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-01 05:28:16; freshness should be verified.

Geography

Global, with subgroup analysis for developed and less developed regions.