Meta-Analysis of Single-Port vs. Two-Port Laparoscopy for Pediatric Inguinal Hernia

13 studies involving 22,846 children were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis comparing transumbilical single-port and two-port laparoscopic surgery for pediatric inguinal hernia. The document, authored by Bo Yang and last updated in May 2026, presents pooled results on outcomes like recurrence rate, operation time, and complications. It concludes that single-port laparoscopy has a lower recurrence rate and comparable safety to the two-port approach.

Use Cases

• Compare postoperative recurrence rates between surgical techniques based on the meta-analysis results.
• Analyze operation time differences in large vs. small sample studies based on the subgroup analysis.
• Evaluate the safety profile of single-port laparoscopy based on complication rate data.
• Inform clinical decision-making for hernia repair based on the evidence-based conclusions.

Strengths

• Includes data from 13 studies and 22,846 pediatric patients.
• Provides specific statistical results (e.g., RR=0.60 for recurrence) with confidence intervals.
• Uses established risk-of-bias assessment tools (ROB2, ROBINS-I) and analysis software (RevMan, R).

Limitations

• The dataset is a 17.2 KB DOCX file containing summary text, not the underlying raw study data.
• Column-level documentation and sample data are unavailable, limiting direct computational use.
• The temporal coverage of included studies is not specified beyond the search cutoff date.

Provenance

Source

figshare

Collection Method

Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science.

Time Range

Studies from database inception to December 31, 2025.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-08 05:55:31.

Geography

null