Chronic Subdural Hematoma Surgical Outcomes: Endoscopic vs. Burr-Hole Drainage

A 2026 retrospective cohort study of 198 surgical cases from Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital compares endoscopic-assisted evacuation and burr-hole drainage for chronic subdural hematoma. The dataset, authored by Yang Mi, includes perioperative outcomes such as residual hematoma rates, neurological recovery, operative time, hospitalization costs, and complication rates. It is shared under a CC-BY-4.0 license.

Use Cases

• Compare residual hematoma rates between two surgical techniques based on the reported 35.00% vs. 54.78% figures.
• Model predictors of good neurological outcome (lower mRS) based on the odds ratio of 0.30 for the endoscopic group.
• Analyze the trade-off between clinical benefit and resource use based on operative time (40.12 min longer) and cost (¥9,600 higher) differences.
• Investigate associations between surgical method and postoperative laboratory measures like hemoglobin count (127.90 vs. 133.00 g/L).

Strengths

• Includes data from 198 patient cases (40 endoscopic, 158 burr-hole), providing a basis for comparative analysis.
• Reports specific, statistically significant outcome metrics such as residual hematoma rates and odds ratios for neurological recovery.
• Captures multidimensional outcomes including clinical measures, procedural costs, and length of hospital stay.

Limitations

• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• Data may reflect geographic bias inherent to a single hospital study from Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital.

Provenance

Source

Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital

Collection Method

Retrospective cohort study of consecutive surgical cases.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-12 05:44:07; freshness should be verified.

Geography

Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital, China