Systematic Review of Bispecific CAR-T Cell Therapy for Acute Leukemias, 2016-2025
by Gabriela Valencia Putri Husodho·Updated 1mo ago
684.3 KB1files
Available on 1 platform
Sign in to view source links and access this dataset
Description
Gabriela Valencia Putri Husodho's systematic review synthesizes evidence from nine studies on bispecific CAR-T cell therapy for acute leukemias. The review, following PRISMA guidelines, covers literature from PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest published between 2016 and 2025. It concludes that bispecific CAR-T therapy is more effective than conventional CAR-T cells for managing acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
Use Cases
Summarizing clinical trial outcomes for bispecific CAR-T therapies based on the review's synthesis of nine studies.
Identifying target antigens for CAR-T development in AML and ALL based on the described targets like CD123, CD33, CD19, and CD22.
Comparing the efficacy and adverse effect profiles of bispecific versus conventional CAR-T cells based on the review's conclusions.
Informing future research directions for CAR-T cell therapy based on the review's focus on developing diverse targets and advancing clinical trials.
Strengths
Follows PRISMA guidelines for systematic review methodology.
Covers a defined time range (2016-2025) and uses three major databases (PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest).
Includes nine studies with in vivo, in vitro, and clinical trial designs, providing a multi-faceted evidence base.
Limitations
Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
The dataset is a single 684.3 KB DOCX file, indicating a limited scope focused on a review document rather than raw experimental data.
Provenance
Source
Gabriela Valencia Putri Husodho via figshare.
Collection Method
Systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines.
Time Range
2016-2025
Freshness
Last updated 2026-04-23 04:21:56; freshness should be verified.
Geography
null
Data is provided as a DOCX document; analysis requires text extraction.