754 non-clinical participants aged 18 to 97 and 102 older adult patients aged 65+ provided data for evaluating dimensional models of personality disorders. The dataset likely contains scores from self-report measures (LPFS-BF 2.0 and PID-5-BF + M), informant reports, and clinical interview data (STiP-5.1). Author Morag Facon published the data on figshare in April 2026.
Use Cases
- Developing age- and gender-specific normative thresholds for personality dysfunction based on the non-clinical sample.
- Evaluating the discriminative validity of dimensional assessment tools (LPFS-BF 2.0, PID-5-BF + M) between clinical and non-clinical groups.
- Comparing self-report measures with informant reports and clinical interview data for multi-method assessment validation.
- Studying the influence of age and gender on personality pathology scores across the adult lifespan.
Strengths
- Includes a non-clinical sample of 754 participants and a clinical sample of 102 older adult patients.
- Data supports the development of age- and gender-specific normative thresholds for clinical application.
- Utilizes a multi-method assessment approach including self-report, informant report, and clinical interview.
Limitations
- Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
- Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
- The dataset is 42.0 KB, indicating a very limited scope likely focused on summary statistics or thresholds.
Provenance
- Source
- figshare
- Collection Method
- Likely gathered via psychological assessments administered to study participants.
- Freshness
- Last updated 2026-04-24 04:22:56; freshness should be verified.