Leadership Styles and Crisis Management Outcomes Meta-Analysis, 50 Studies

Chan Nyein Aung's meta-analysis examines correlations between leadership styles and crisis management outcomes in public administration. The analysis includes 50 studies, 72 effect sizes, 26 leadership styles, and represents 21815 participants, following PRISMA guidelines. The dataset is a document summarizing findings from a systematic search of eight databases for studies published until December 2025.

Use Cases

• Analyzing the prevalence of transformational leadership in crisis contexts based on the meta-analysis findings
• Investigating moderating effects of administrative subfields and continent on leadership-outcome relationships
• Studying correlations between leadership styles and specific crisis management outcomes like sense-making and learning
• Testing hypotheses about the influence of hierarchy level and crisis type on leadership effectiveness

Strengths

• Includes 50 studies and 21815 participants, providing a substantial evidence base
• Analyzes 26 distinct leadership styles and 72 effect sizes
• Methodological quality was evaluated using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools
• Publication bias was tested (Egger's test, p = 0.29) and no substantial bias was detected

Limitations

• The dataset is a 697.8 KB DOCX document; the underlying raw data or full study tables are not provided
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred from the document text
• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment for quantitative reuse

Provenance

Source

figshare, author Chan Nyein Aung

Collection Method

Systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines, searching eight databases

Time Range

Studies published until December 2025

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-18 04:17:02

Geography

Global scope, with moderator analysis by administrative continent