Veteran Experiences with Tele-PAP vs. Face-to-Face Sleep Apnea Treatment Setup

A 2026 qualitative study based on interviews with 40 U.S. Veterans, conducted by Kyu Seo Kim and published on figshare. The research documents patient experiences and preferences for telehealth versus in-person setup of Positive Airway Pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Use Cases

• Analyzing patient-reported barriers and facilitators to telemedicine based on interview themes like travel cost and learning style.
• Comparing patient satisfaction between telehealth and in-person clinical setups based on the described qualitative evaluation.
• Identifying common challenges in durable medical equipment support, such as troubleshooting contact recall, mentioned in the results.
• Studying the impact of concurrent psychological factors like PTSD on treatment modality preference as indicated in the findings.

Strengths

• Qualitative data from 40 semi-structured interviews provides in-depth patient perspectives.
• Analysis involved independent coding by at least two investigators, suggesting a structured review process.
• Dataset is openly licensed under CC-BY-4.0, permitting reuse and redistribution.

Limitations

• The dataset is a 16.6 KB DOCX file; the underlying interview data or coded transcripts are not directly provided.
• Row count and column-level documentation are unknown, limiting immediate suitability assessment.
• The sample is a convenience sample of 40 Veterans, which may limit generalizability of findings.

Provenance

Source

figshare, authored by Kyu Seo Kim.

Collection Method

Semi-structured phone interviews with a convenience sample, coded by investigators using qualitative analysis software.

Time Range

Study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic; specific collection dates not provided.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-06-02 05:26:32.

Geography

United States, focusing on U.S. Veterans.