Systematic Review of Motivation in Motor Training Interventions After Stroke

A systematic review of 17 randomized controlled trials published up to August 2025, including 521 stroke survivors. The review, conducted by M. Schrader, identifies and summarizes studies evaluating the motivational effects of motor improvement interventions like exergaming and animal-assisted therapy. It was prospectively registered in PROSPERO and follows PRISMA reporting guidelines.

Use Cases

• Identifying evidence gaps for motivation assessment in stroke rehabilitation based on the review's conclusion.
• Comparing the motivational impact of different interventions like exergaming and animal-assisted therapy based on the summarized trial results.
• Informing the design of future clinical trials targeting both motor and motivational outcomes based on the reported risk of bias and promising avenues.

Strengths

• Follows a structured, prospectively registered methodology (PROSPERO CRD42023448438) and PRISMA guidelines.
• Summarizes findings from 17 trials with a total of 521 participants, providing a quantified scope.
• Explicitly reports the direction of effect for assessments and the high risk of bias common across included studies.

Limitations

• The underlying data is a 31.4 KB PDF document; the raw trial data or a structured data table is not provided.
• The review's primary finding is that motivation is measured only rarely, indicating a limited evidence base.
• Row count for any underlying data is unknown, and column-level documentation is absent.

Provenance

Source

M. Schrader via figshare.

Collection Method

Systematic literature review of databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, and PEDro conducted in August 2025.

Time Range

Trials included up to the search date of August 2025.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-28 05:57:48.