Usability and Acceptability Scale Validation Data for Digital Tools

908 participants aged 4 to 18 were assessed using the Usability and Acceptability Scale (UAS). Matilde Spinoso published the psychometric validation results in April 2026. The study supports a bifactorial model for evaluating digital tools among children and adolescents.

Use Cases

• Validate the bifactorial model by analyzing factor loadings for usability and acceptability dimensions.
• Assess internal consistency of the UAS using reported Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω reliability metrics.
• Correlate participant age (4-18) with usability and acceptability scores to identify developmental trends.
• Compare UAS scores across different digital tool types administered to the 908-child sample.

Strengths

• Validation sample of 908 participants provides a solid basis for psychometric analysis.
• Results include both Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses supporting a consistent bifactorial structure.
• Reliability assessed with two metrics (Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω) indicating acceptable internal consistency.

Limitations

• Dataset size is only 24.1 KB, suggesting limited raw data or only summary statistics are available.
• Specific column names and individual participant responses are not provided, restricting detailed re-analysis.
• Geographic and demographic details of the 908 participants are unknown, limiting generalizability.

Provenance

Source

Matilde Spinoso via figshare.

Collection Method

Scale administered to a sample of 908 participants aged 4-18.

Time Range

null

Freshness

Last updated in April 2026.

Geography

null