Psychosocial Responses to Outdoor Artificial Light at Night: A Scoping Review

Kévin Nadarajah's scoping review synthesizes 75 studies on psychosocial responses to outdoor artificial light at night (ALAN). The review, following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, maps methodological approaches, main psychosocial dimensions, and reported findings. The document was last updated on 2026-05-29 and is shared under a CC-BY-4.0 license.

Use Cases

• Identify research gaps in psychosocial dimensions of light pollution based on the review's finding that cognitive and behavioral aspects are less studied.
• Analyze methodological trends in ALAN research based on the review's analysis of quantitative and cross-sectional designs.
• Inform lighting policy design based on synthesized findings about perceptions, emotions, and attitudes toward ALAN.

Strengths

• Follows a structured review methodology (PRISMA-ScR guidelines).
• Analyzes a defined corpus of 75 scientific studies.
• Explicitly licensed for reuse under CC-BY-4.0.

Limitations

• The 3.7 MB file is a review document, not a primary dataset; row count and column-level data are unavailable.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• The review notes that included studies are concentrated in a few countries, which may indicate geographic bias.

Provenance

Source

Kévin Nadarajah via figshare

Collection Method

Scoping review following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, analyzing 75 studies from seven databases.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-29 04:50:41; freshness should be verified.

Geography

The review notes research is concentrated in a few countries, but specific geographic coverage is not defined.