SBAID vs. SBID: Chronic Subdural Hematoma Recurrence and Outcomes, 2016-2024

A single-center retrospective cohort study by Zhenjiang Pan compares a standardized surgical workflow (SBAID) to conventional treatment (SBID) for chronic subdural hematoma. The dataset includes 186 patients treated between November 2016 and December 2024, with outcomes tracked for 60 days. It contains primary and secondary clinical outcomes, including reoperation rates, operative duration, length of stay, and quantitative imaging markers.

Use Cases

• Compare 60-day reoperation rates between SBAID and SBID surgical techniques.
• Analyze the association between surgical workflow and postoperative cavity-air burden based on 48-hour and 30-day imaging volumes.
• Investigate correlations between surgical method and secondary outcomes like operative time, length of stay, and postoperative seizures.

Strengths

• Includes 186 patient records with a clear comparison group (151 SBAID vs. 35 SBID).
• Reports specific, statistically significant outcome differences, such as a 2.6% vs. 14.3% 60-day reoperation rate.
• Covers a defined time range from November 2016 to December 2024.

Limitations

• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• Data is from a single-center retrospective study, which may limit generalizability.

Provenance

Source

Zhenjiang Pan via figshare.

Collection Method

Single-center retrospective cohort study.

Time Range

November 2016 to December 2024.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-19 04:20:56; freshness should be verified.