Strategy Jam Workshop Outcomes for Hybrid Research Teams

A 2026 pilot study by Bethany Laursen tracks outcomes from five hybrid research teams participating in design-thinking-based chartering workshops. It includes quantitative survey scores for team purpose and structure, along with qualitative interview data on factors influencing outcomes. The data supports a mixed-methods, longitudinal analysis of team science facilitation.

Use Cases

• Analyze changes in Team Diagnostic Survey scores for 'compelling purpose' and 'sound structure' pre- and post-workshop.
• Correlate qualitative interview themes on design-thinking factors with quantitative outcome scores for the five pilot teams.
• Model longitudinal changes in chartering outcomes using the mixed-methods explanatory study design.
• Identify contextual and generic workshop factors from interview data that influenced team chartering success.

Strengths

• Includes longitudinal data from a mixed-methods study design.
• Quantitative metrics show specific percentage changes (e.g., 13% average increase in purpose scores).
• Covers five distinct hybrid research/research support teams for comparative analysis.

Limitations

• Small sample size of five teams limits statistical generalizability.
• One team's sound structure score decreased by 11%, indicating potential intervention variability.
• Dataset scale is small (3.9 MB), primarily containing a document analysis rather than raw structured data.

Provenance

Source

Bethany Laursen via figshare.

Collection Method

Data collected via Team Diagnostic Survey and interviews with team leaders in a pilot study.

Time Range

Pilot study period, specific dates unknown.

Freshness

Last updated in April 2026.