Bronchoscopy-Guided vs. Conventional Tracheostomy Decannulation Outcomes, 2023-2025

81 adult patients with prolonged tracheostomy from a tertiary center between 2023 and 2025 were analyzed in a retrospective comparative cohort study by Rundi Gao. The study compares a bronchoscopy-guided non-capping decannulation pathway (n=23) to a conventional capping trial (n=58). Primary and secondary outcomes include decannulation failure rate, time to decannulation, and infectious complications.

Use Cases

• Compare decannulation failure rates between bronchoscopy-guided and conventional capping pathways based on the described study outcomes.
• Analyze the association between decannulation method and time to successful decannulation based on the reported adjusted hazard ratio.
• Investigate the relationship between decannulation pathway and infectious complication rates mentioned in the results.

Strengths

• 81 patient records analyzed in a comparative cohort study.
• Multivariable and sensitivity analyses were performed to address baseline imbalances.
• Specific primary (decannulation failure) and secondary (time to decannulation, infectious episodes) outcomes are defined.

Limitations

• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• Data is from a single-center observational study, which may limit generalizability.

Provenance

Source

Rundi Gao via figshare.

Collection Method

Retrospective comparative cohort study.

Time Range

2023 to 2025

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-15 05:43:00; freshness should be verified.

Geography

A single tertiary center; specific location unknown.