Systematic Review of 84 Citizen Science Projects in Chemistry and Biology Education

84 primary studies were analyzed in a systematic review of citizen science projects in Chemistry and Biology education. The review, authored by Carmen Viviana Basantes-Vaca and published on figshare under CC-BY-4.0, identifies participant profiles, educational contributions, and implementation challenges. The document was last updated on March 17, 2026.

Use Cases

• Analyzing the disciplinary focus of citizen science projects based on the described prevalence of Biology topics like ecology and biodiversity.
• Identifying common participant profiles in educational citizen science based on the description of high school and university students as predominant participants.
• Studying the reported educational and social contributions of citizen science, such as hands-on learning and data collection for environmental problems.
• Investigating implementation challenges for citizen science in education based on described issues like limited resources and teacher training.

Strengths

• The review is based on 84 primary studies selected for relevance, timeliness, and methodological rigor.
• The document provides a clear synthesis of project topics, participant profiles, contributions, and challenges.
• The dataset is openly licensed under CC-BY-4.0, facilitating reuse and distribution.

Limitations

• The core data is a 658.4 KB DOCX file, which is a small document and not a structured data table.
• Row count and column-level documentation are absent; the content must be manually extracted from the text.
• The geographic and temporal coverage of the underlying studies is not specified in the provided metadata.

Provenance

Source

figshare, authored by Carmen Viviana Basantes-Vaca.

Collection Method

Systematic literature review conducted following the PRISMA methodology.

Time Range

The temporal coverage of the 84 included primary studies is not specified.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-03-17 13:06:58

Geography

The geographic coverage of the reviewed projects is not specified.