Table 2_Comparative effects of unilateral and bilateral plyometric training on physical fi

11 studies involving 388 participants were analyzed to compare training effects. The dataset contains the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis, authored by Fengming Zhang and last updated in April 2026. It synthesizes findings on jump, sprint, and change-of-direction performance from studies sourced from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase.

Use Cases

• Comparing the efficacy of unilateral versus bilateral plyometric training based on synthesized effect sizes.
• Investigating task-specific training adaptations for single-leg versus bilateral performance metrics.
• Informing evidence-based training program design for adolescent team-sport athletes.

Strengths

• Results are based on a systematic review of 11 studies with 388 total participants.
• Effect sizes are reported with 95% confidence intervals and I² statistics for heterogeneity.
• The dataset is shared under a CC-BY-4.0 license, permitting reuse with attribution.

Limitations

• The primary data file is a 266.5 KB DOCX document; the underlying tabular meta-analysis data is not directly accessible in a structured format.
• Row count for the synthesized data is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• The dataset scope is limited to the specific research question of the included meta-analysis.

Provenance

Source

figshare

Collection Method

Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-04-27 04:13:09