Table 2_Comparative efficacy of portable active cooling vs. passive cooling for reducing c

11 randomized and crossover trials with 148 participants form the basis of this meta-analysis comparing cooling methods for exertional heat stroke. The data, compiled by Chuankai Shi, shows portable active cooling with external refrigerant systems cools 0.02°C/min faster than passive cooling. The dataset was last updated on 2026-05-29 and is available under a CC-BY-4.0 license.

Use Cases

• Compare cooling rates between active and passive methods based on the reported mean difference (MD) of 0.02 °C/min.
• Evaluate the efficacy of different device types (external refrigerant vs. wearable pre-cooling) based on subgroup analysis results.
• Inform field equipment selection for heat illness management based on the conclusion that cooling mechanism is more critical than portability.

Strengths

• Analysis is based on a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 guidelines with a PROSPERO registration.
• Includes results from 11 trials involving 148 participants, providing a quantitative synthesis of evidence.
• Provides specific numerical outcomes, including mean differences, confidence intervals, and p-values for the primary comparison and device subgroups.

Limitations

• Row count and column-level documentation are absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• The dataset is very small at 22.8 KB, indicating it likely contains only summary results, not the underlying trial data.

Provenance

Source

Chuankai Shi via figshare

Collection Method

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and crossover trials.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-29 06:13:26; freshness should be verified.