Cross-Training Meta-Analysis: Effects on VO2max and Running Performance

A systematic review and meta-analysis of 7 randomized controlled trials compares running-only and cycling-only training interventions. The analysis found no statistically significant differences in sport-specific VO2max or running performance outcomes between the two modalities. The document, authored by T. Menges and licensed CC-BY-4.0, was last updated in May 2026.

Use Cases

• Evaluate the evidence for cross-training efficacy based on the systematic review of 7 studies
• Compare training modality effects on VO2max based on treadmill and cycle ergometer assessments
• Analyze the transfer of adaptations to running performance based on time trial outcomes
• Assess methodological heterogeneity and risk of bias in existing training studies

Strengths

• Focuses on a specific research question with a defined methodology (systematic review and meta-analysis).
• Includes sensitivity analyses to evaluate the robustness of the results.
• Provides standardized effect sizes (Hedges' g) with confidence intervals for all outcomes.

Limitations

• Description metadata is limited; actual data quality requires manual inspection after download.
• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• The analysis is based on a limited number of studies (n=7) and acknowledges substantial uncertainty in the findings.

Provenance

Source

figshare

Collection Method

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-25 06:03:52; freshness should be verified.