Evidence Map for Acupuncture and Moxibustion RCTs in Dry Eye Disease
by Qidi Liu·Updated 2mo ago
1.2 MB1files
Available on 1 platform
Sign in to view source links and access this dataset
Description
Qidi Liu's evidence map integrates 319 randomized controlled trials on acupuncture and moxibustion for dry eye disease, published up to December 1, 2025. The map presents study characteristics, interventions, outcome indicators, and quality assessments using the RoB 2.0 tool. The dataset was last updated on April 21, 2026.
Use Cases
Analyze the distribution of Traditional Chinese Medicine syndrome types in clinical trials based on the six identified types, such as liver-kidney yin deficiency.
Compare the frequency of different intervention types based on the 17 monotherapies and 31 combination therapies identified.
Evaluate the methodological quality of existing research based on the Risk of Bias 2.0 assessments described in the results.
Identify commonly used outcome measures for dry eye disease based on the 13 categories, such as ocular surface health assessment indicators.
Strengths
Includes 319 randomized controlled trials, providing a substantial evidence base.
Categorizes interventions into 17 monotherapy and 31 combination therapy types, offering detailed intervention mapping.
Classifies outcome indicators into 13 categories, including ocular surface health and TCM symptom scores.
Limitations
The methodological quality of the included literature is described as generally low.
Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment for specific analytical tasks.
Provenance
Source
Studies retrieved from CNKI, VIP Database, WanFang Data, CBM, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library.
Collection Method
Systematic evidence mapping of randomized controlled trials.
Time Range
Database inception to December 1, 2025.
Freshness
Last updated 2026-04-21 04:22:40; freshness should be verified.
License is CC-BY-4.0. The 1.2 MB file size suggests a small, likely summary-level dataset.