Systematic Review of Community-Based Interventions for Aging in Place

91 publications representing 85 independent randomized controlled trials were synthesized to evaluate community-based public health interventions for older adults. The review, authored by Adnan Kisa and last updated in May 2026, assessed interventions like physical activity programs and social engagement initiatives. It found 45% of publications had a low risk of bias, with interventions generally associated with improved functional ability and mental well-being.

Use Cases

• Identify effective intervention components for aging in place based on synthesized evidence from randomized controlled trials.
• Assess the impact of multi-domain models on functional outcomes like gait speed and balance.
• Evaluate the relationship between psychosocial enablers, such as self-efficacy, and independence maintenance.
• Inform public health planning by analyzing the success of structured, scalable community-based programs.

Strengths

• Systematic methodology includes 85 independent randomized controlled trials from multiple databases.
• Interventions are categorized into specific types like physical activity and nutrition programs.
• Methodological quality is assessed using a standardized checklist, with 45% of publications rated low risk of bias.

Limitations

• The underlying data tables and column-level details are not provided in the available metadata.
• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment for quantitative analysis.
• The 38.3 KB file size suggests the document is a summary review, not a primary dataset.

Provenance

Source

Adnan Kisa via figshare.

Collection Method

Systematic review of literature from MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-15 05:48:56; freshness should be verified.