Stakeholder Participation Approaches in Global Land Readjustment

47 peer-reviewed empirical studies form a systematic meta-synthesis on stakeholder participation in urban land readjustment. The analysis identifies seven recurring participatory approaches and key institutional barriers. Authored by Fawaz Alasmari and published in April 2026.

Use Cases

• Analyze the frequency of 'inclusive decision-making' or 'negotiation and consensus building' approaches across the 47 reviewed studies.
• Map identified 'institutional barriers' such as 'fragmentation' or 'procedural complexity' against geographic contexts mentioned in the source literature.
• Extract and categorize qualitative themes like 'transparency and trust' or 'equitable cost–benefit sharing' for comparative framework development.
• Use the synthesized conceptual framework detailing the 'who, where, when, what and how' to model participation across the land readjustment lifecycle.

Strengths

• Systematic review based on 47 peer-reviewed empirical studies using the PRISMA protocol.
• Identifies seven distinct participatory approaches and key institutional barriers from a global synthesis.
• Results synthesized into a conceptual framework mapping participation across the land readjustment lifecycle.

Limitations

• Dataset is a 23.9 KB document, containing only the synthesized analysis, not the raw data from the 47 source studies.
• No quantitative or tabular data provided; analysis is qualitative and textual.
• Sample size of underlying studies (47) is modest for a global meta-synthesis.

Provenance

Source

figshare, authored by Fawaz Alasmari.

Collection Method

Systematic qualitative meta-synthesis of peer-reviewed literature using PRISMA protocol and thematic analysis.

Time Range

Covers studies up to the date of the meta-synthesis.

Freshness

Last updated April 2026.

Geography

Global coverage based on the synthesis of international empirical studies.