Systematic Review of S100 Proteins in IgA Vasculitis
by Zofia Podraza·Updated 3mo ago
18.3 KB1files
Available on 1 platform
Sign in to view source links and access this dataset
Description
54 studies were synthesized in a PRISMA-compliant systematic review investigating S100 proteins in vasculitides. The review, authored by Zofia Podraza and updated in March 2026, focuses on the mechanistic and clinical roles of S100A8/9, S100A12, S100A4, and S100A10. It evaluates their potential as biomarkers for disease activity and prognosis in IgA vasculitis and other systemic vasculitides.
Use Cases
Analyze the reported evidence on S100A8/9 and S100A12 as markers of neutrophil-driven inflammation and disease activity.
Compare findings on S100A4 and S100A10 across studies to identify fragmentary or indirect evidence in vasculitis research.
Synthesize data from the 54 included studies to evaluate the potential of specific S100 proteins as clinical biomarkers for risk stratification in IgA vasculitis.
Strengths
Synthesizes findings from 54 original human studies on a specific biological pathway.
Follows a PRISMA-compliant systematic review methodology for structured evidence synthesis.
Focuses on four specific S100 protein families (S100A8/9, S100A12, S100A4, S100A10) with clear biological relevance.
Limitations
The dataset is a summary table from a literature review (18.3 KB), not raw experimental or patient-level data.
Findings for S100A4 and S100A10 are described as fragmentary and lack sufficient IgA vasculitis-specific data.
Evidence is synthesized narratively; no quantitative meta-analysis or aggregated statistical results are provided.
Provenance
Source
Systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science.
Collection Method
PRISMA-compliant systematic search and narrative synthesis of original human studies.
Time Range
Literature search covered studies up to November 2025.
Freshness
Literature search conducted up to November 18, 2025; dataset last updated March 25, 2026.
Geography
null
File is a small (18.3 KB) Excel summary table from a systematic review; it does not contain the primary data from the 54 underlying studies.