Systematic Review of Community-Based Interventions for Aging in Place

A systematic review synthesizes evidence from 85 independent randomized controlled trials on community-based interventions for older adults. The review, authored by Adnan Kisa and published on figshare in 2026, analyzed 91 publications from major databases like MEDLINE/PubMed and Embase. It categorizes outcomes into primary independence measures, functional capacity proxies, and psychosocial enablers.

Use Cases

• Identify effective intervention components for promoting functional ability based on the review's analysis of physical activity and multidomain models.
• Assess the quality of evidence for aging-in-place strategies based on the reported risk-of-bias classifications across 91 publications.
• Inform program design by analyzing the association between tailored delivery formats and improvements in psychosocial enablers mentioned in the results.

Strengths

• The review is based on 85 independent randomized controlled trials, a robust study design for evaluating interventions.
• Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist, with 45% of publications classified as low risk of bias.
• Data was extracted from five major academic databases, including MEDLINE/PubMed and Web of Science.

Limitations

• The dataset is a single 18.3 KB DOCX file, which suggests limited scope as it likely contains only the review manuscript.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• The underlying trial data is not directly accessible, limiting suitability for secondary quantitative analysis.

Provenance

Source

figshare

Collection Method

Systematic review of literature from MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-15 05:48:58; freshness should be verified.