Table 7_Herbst and Twin Block appliances in Class II malocclusion management for children:

Seven randomized controlled trials with 548 participants were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis authored by Franz Tito Coronel-Zubiate. It compares the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue effects of Herbst and Twin Block appliances for managing Class II malocclusion in children. The review, registered with PROSPERO, was last updated in May 2026.

Use Cases

• Comparing treatment outcomes between Herbst and Twin Block appliances based on skeletal, dental, and soft tissue parameters.
• Informing clinical decision-making for Class II malocclusion management based on patient-specific factors like adherence and growth stage.
• Assessing the certainty of evidence for orthodontic interventions using GRADE methodology.
• Conducting secondary meta-analyses on orthodontic appliance effectiveness using the included RCT data.

Strengths

• Includes data from 7 RCTs with a total of 548 participants, providing a quantitative basis for comparison.
• Employs rigorous Cochrane RoB 2.0 and GRADE methods for assessing study quality and evidence certainty.
• Reports specific standardized mean differences with confidence intervals for key outcomes like mentolabial angle and molar relationship.

Limitations

• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• The dataset is a 676.2 KB document, suggesting the primary data are summarized results rather than raw patient-level records.

Provenance

Source

figshare

Collection Method

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials sourced from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE.

Time Range

Literature search conducted until January 30, 2025.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-15 07:47:32; freshness should be verified.