Taboo Trade-offs and Relational Framing in Economic Exchange Experiments

Four experiments investigate how social-relational framing complicates economic exchanges. The data likely contains measures of pricing distortions, moral outrage, and tactical flexibility in responses to taboo trade-offs. The research was conducted by A. Peter McGraw at the University of Colorado Boulder.

Use Cases

• Modeling moral outrage responses based on breaches of relational boundaries described in the experiments.
• Analyzing pricing distortions based on the valuation of objects with special relational significance.
• Studying cognitive confusion patterns when market norms conflict with communal-sharing or authority-ranking relationships.
• Investigating tactical flexibility in decision-making based on the described willingness to ignore taboo trade-offs for personal interest.

Strengths

• Data is derived from four structured experiments, suggesting a controlled study design.
• Theoretical grounding is explicitly stated, drawing from Alan Fiske's framework and Tetlock's sacred value model.

Limitations

• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• Last update date is unknown; freshness unverified.

Provenance

Source

A. Peter McGraw, University of Colorado Boulder

Collection Method

Data likely gathered from controlled psychological experiments as reported in the article.

Time Range

Temporal coverage of the experiments is unknown.

Freshness

Last updated date is unknown.

Geography

Spatial coverage of the participant pool is unknown.