The Extended Mind Thesis: Philosophical and Cognitive Science Arguments

A conceptual paper by Julian Kiverstein of the University of Amsterdam, arguing that human cognitive processes can extend beyond the individual to include aspects of the physical and sociocultural environment. The work discusses the integration of tools like pens, paper, and computers as part of the machinery of thought. It is sourced from the paperswithcode platform, which aggregates resources for AI and ML practitioners.

Use Cases

• Literature review on theories of extended and embodied cognition based on the philosophical arguments presented.
• Conceptual analysis for human-computer interaction design based on the thesis of deeply integrated technological resources.
• Training or fine-tuning language models on philosophical discourse based on the text of the extended mind thesis.

Strengths

• Authored by a recognized academic (Julian Kiverstein) from the University of Amsterdam.
• Provides a detailed philosophical argument for a specific thesis in cognitive science.

Limitations

• The dataset is a single conceptual paper; it does not contain empirical or structured data for analysis.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment for data-centric tasks.

Provenance

Source

Julian Kiverstein, University of Amsterdam, via paperswithcode.

Collection Method

Likely a published academic paper or manuscript.