Scholarly Analysis of Replication Crisis Factors in Psychological Science

Xenia Schmalz from the University of Padua authored this Open Access paper analyzing the replication crisis in psychological science. The text discusses three key contributing factors: underpowered studies, publication bias, and questionable research practices. It focuses on potential solutions to the problem of underpowered studies.

Use Cases

• Analyzing the discourse on research reproducibility based on the described conceptual framework.
• Studying the cited literature on underpowered studies and publication bias.
• Identifying proposed solutions to the replication crisis based on the author's discussion.

Strengths

• Authored by a researcher at the University of Padua.
• Published under an Open Access (diamond) license.
• Provides a detailed conceptual analysis of the replication crisis with specific cited factors.

Limitations

• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• Last update date is unknown; freshness unverified.

Provenance

Source

Xenia Schmalz, University of Padua

Collection Method

Scholarly analysis and synthesis of existing research.