Psychological Logic of Peace Summits: Analysis of Empathy in Diplomatic Negotiations
by Marcus Holmes / William & Mary
Available on 1 platform
Sign in to view source links and access this dataset
Description
Marcus Holmes of William & Mary presents a study on the role of empathy in peace summit outcomes. The work compares two Middle East peace process summits, Camp David 1978 and the 2000 summit, to assess the empirical ramifications of conveyed and relational empathy. The dataset likely contains textual analysis of negotiations, leader behaviors, and mediation strategies.
Use Cases
Modeling negotiation success based on conveyed empathy through words and expressive behaviors.
Analyzing mediator effectiveness in building relational empathy between disputants.
Comparing psychological factors in historical diplomatic events with divergent outcomes.
Strengths
Analysis is grounded in studies from psychology and negotiation fields.
Focuses on two salient, real-world case studies with clear divergent outcomes.
Author is affiliated with an academic institution (William & Mary).
Limitations
Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
Row count and data scale are unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
Last update date is unknown; freshness unverified.
Provenance
Source
Marcus Holmes, William & Mary
Collection Method
Likely involves qualitative and/or quantitative analysis of historical summit records, speeches, and behavioral observations.