Julie A. Marsh's research analyzes three urban districts' efforts to improve instructional quality and school performance. The study assesses the contribution of an intermediary organization, the Institute for Learning, to these reform efforts. It identifies constraints and enablers of district success and makes recommendations for similar instructional reforms.
Use Cases
- Analyze district-level constraints and enablers for instructional improvement based on the described case studies.
- Assess the nature and effect of district-intermediary partnerships based on the described analysis.
- Model factors contributing to successful instructional reforms in urban districts based on the identified recommendations.
Strengths
- Analysis is based on three distinct urban district case studies.
- Research includes specific assessment of an intermediary organization's role.
Limitations
- Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
- Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
- Data may reflect geographic or institutional bias inherent to the three studied districts.
Provenance
- Source
- Julie A. Marsh
- Collection Method
- Case study analysis of three urban districts.
- Time Range
- null
- Freshness
- Last update date is unknown; freshness unverified.
- Geography
- Urban districts in the United States (likely).