Analysis of Preprint Posting Policies and Practices in Scientific Publishing

A text-based analysis advocating for preprint posting in scientific publishing, authored by Nikolaus Kriegeskorte. The description details the benefits of preprints for open access and error correction, citing examples from institutions like Harvard and the UK's Medical Research Council. It references major platforms like arXiv and bioRxiv and journals including Nature and Science.

Use Cases

• Analyzing the economic impact of journal paywalls based on cited subscription costs.
• Studying the adoption and policy support for preprints based on mentions of journals like Nature and Science.
• Modeling the relationship between preprint posting and citation impact based on the described advantage for journal impact factors.
• Evaluating institutional access to scientific literature based on the described examples from Harvard and the MRC.

Strengths

• Authored by a named scientist, Nikolaus Kriegeskorte, providing a clear point of view.
• Cites specific examples, such as the University of Cambridge's annual subscription fees to Elsevier exceeding one million pounds.
• References concrete platforms (arXiv, bioRxiv) and policy resources (ROMEO, SHERPA).

Limitations

• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• Last update date is unknown; freshness unverified.

Provenance

Source

paperswithcode

Collection Method

Likely a curated essay or position paper.