VR vs. Mannequin Training for Trauma Management Situational Awareness in Iran

35 medical interns in Iran participated in a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing virtual reality with eye-tracking feedback to conventional mannequin-based training. The study, authored by Navaz Emadi and hosted on Jeehp Dataverse, measured changes in situational awareness, Advanced Trauma Life Support performance, and error scores. Data was last updated on May 20, 2026.

Use Cases

• Compare training modality efficacy based on pre-post intervention scores for situational awareness.
• Analyze the relationship between eye-tracking feedback and trauma-management error scores as described in the study.
• Evaluate the feasibility of implementing VR simulations with interruptions for emergency department training scenarios.

Strengths

• Data originates from a randomized controlled trial with 35 participants (17 in VR group, 18 in mannequin group).
• Outcomes include three specific, measured scores: situational awareness, ATLS performance, and trauma-management errors.
• Statistical analysis methods (Wilcoxon signed-rank, Mann-Whitney U) and effect size reporting (r) are explicitly stated.

Limitations

• Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
• Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
• The dataset is described as a pilot study, which typically implies a small sample size for feasibility.

Provenance

Source

Jeehp Dataverse

Collection Method

Data collected from a pilot randomized pretest-posttest study with medical interns.

Freshness

Last updated 2026-05-20 20:58:13; freshness should be verified.

Geography

Iran