Comparative analysis between quenching and partitioning versus quenching and tempering for
by Rafael César Lamim Martins De Oliveira
Available on 1 platform
Sign in to view source links and access this dataset
Description
Rafael César Lamim Martins De Oliveira authored a study comparing quenching and partitioning (Q&P) to quenching and tempering (TR) heat treatments for SAE 4340 steel. The dataset likely contains experimental results from microstructural analysis via optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and X-ray diffraction, as well as Vickers microhardness measurements. The Q&P treatment involved austenitizing at 870°C, quenching to 240°C, and partitioning for three different times (10 s, 30 s, 90 s).
Use Cases
Compare microstructural evolution based on different heat treatment parameters described in the study.
Analyze the relationship between partitioning time and retained austenite stabilization based on X-ray diffraction results.
Model the correlation between heat treatment process and mechanical properties based on Vickers microhardness data.
Benchmark the performance of quenching and partitioning against traditional quenching and tempering for SAE 4340 steel.
Strengths
Includes specific experimental parameters such as austenitizing temperature (870°C), quenching temperature (240°C), and three partitioning times (10 s, 30 s, 90 s).
Reports a concrete high hardness measurement of 696HV1 for one of the treatments.
Uses multiple characterization techniques: optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and Vickers microhardness tests.
Limitations
Row count is unknown, which may limit suitability assessment.
Column-level documentation is absent; field semantics must be inferred after download.
Last update date is unknown; freshness unverified.
Provenance
Source
Rafael César Lamim Martins De Oliveira via paperswithcode
Collection Method
Experimental laboratory study involving heat treatment and material characterization.
License is listed as Open Access (green); specific terms should be verified.